Visionary Network Logo
Menu
  • Home
    • Research
  • About
    • Contact
    • Meet the Visionary Panel
    • Privacy Policy
    • Malcolm Gardner
  • Networks
    • Council Tax Support Schemes Uploads
    • Why get involved?
    • Revenues & Benefits Discussion Group
    • Visionary Network Spring Season 2023
    • Automation & AI Research Network
      • Automation February Session 1
      • Automation February Session 2
      • Automation February Session 3
      • Automation February Session 4
    • Welcome to the Pop-Up Consultancy & Networking Hub
  • Services
    • Clear and Concise
      • Welcome to a New Era of Council Tax Reduction Schemes
        • How it works: Redrafting Scheme Protocol
        • Our Clients
        • CTR Rewrite Pricing
      • Case Study: Reviewing and Simplifying Complex Council Tax Reduction Schemes
    • Consultancy
    • Design of Council Tax Reduction Schemes
    • Maximize Pension Credits with Visionary Network’s Partners Ascendant Solutions and Inbest.ai
  • Blog
  • Partners
Menu

Independent Revenues & Benefits Discussion Group: Council Tax Reduction Review Highlights

Posted on 11/06/2025 by Malcolm

The latest session of the Independent Revenues & Benefits Discussion Group, held on 9 June 2025, offered an invaluable insight into the current state of Council Tax Reduction (CTR) schemes across the country. This week, we were fortunate to be joined by Karen Holmes from entitledto, who delivered an excellent and highly informative presentation on her newly published report reviewing CTR schemes for 2025/26.

Karen began by setting out the context of the review, noting the increasing financial pressures many authorities face, particularly in London. While there was initial concern that this would lead to widespread cuts in support, the data revealed a more nuanced picture. Though some authorities have made reductions, many others have sought to maintain or even enhance support within the constraints of their budgets. Karen highlighted that support levels are increasingly shaped by each authority’s financial resilience, creating what she aptly described as a “postcode lottery”.

Among the key findings presented:

  • Increased Activity: 21% of local authorities have made changes to their schemes this year, a notable rise compared to previous years.
  • Shifts Towards Banded Schemes: There are now 126 banded schemes, accounting for over 40% of all schemes nationally.
  • Diverging Approaches: While 28 authorities increased minimum payments, 18 authorities chose to reduce them, with minimum payments as high as 60% now being observed in some areas.
  • Geographical Variations: London boroughs featured prominently among those reducing support, whereas authorities in the East and West Midlands were more likely to have enhanced their schemes.
  • Administrative Considerations: Many authorities are adopting banded schemes or introducing income tolerances to simplify administration and reduce costly re-billing triggered by Universal Credit fluctuations.

Following Karen’s presentation, a lively discussion ensued. Darren Smith and Julie Smethurst both emphasised how banded schemes have helped improve collection rates and administrative efficiency, with Julie explaining how Tameside had successfully transitioned while maintaining support levels for 90% of claimants. Robert Fox highlighted the often overlooked software costs associated with implementing scheme changes, while Gareth Morgan underscored the complexity and inconsistency in how schemes are described and applied by different councils.

The conversation also explored the future challenges posed by local government reorganisation. Karen referenced recent mergers such as North Yorkshire, where authorities with diverse schemes have had to negotiate significant harmonisation issues. Malcolm Gardner noted the importance of using any lead-in period prior to reorganisation to proactively align schemes, avoiding last-minute disruptions.

The group also took time to examine the emerging activities of Reform UK’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Malcolm led a discussion on the implications of Reform UK’s audits, data access challenges, and concerns around legality and procurement rules. Paul Howarth and Gareth Morgan offered cautionary reflections on the practicalities and political motivations behind these initiatives.

In closing, Malcolm extended his thanks and appreciation to Karen for her superb analysis and for sharing the entitledto report, which provided the group with a comprehensive overview of CTR developments and challenges.

Next week, the group will reconvene for a special session dedicated to the upcoming Spending Review. With many authorities anxiously awaiting its implications for local government finances, it promises to be another timely and important discussion.

The Independent Revenues & Benefits Discussion Group continues to provide a vital forum for expert analysis, shared learning, and open debate at a time of significant policy flux.

For more information or to join future sessions, contact Malcolm Gardner at Visionary Network. info@visionarynetwork.co.uk

The recording can be found at Recording Link

Files to be downloaded

IR&BDG 20250609Download
entitledtoctrreport2526-finalDownload
Spending Review 2025Download
unlocking-the-potential-of-young-people-furthest-from-the-labour-market-df8d352259f50f63ab3f05002dc00161Download
Written statements – Written questions, answers and statements – UK ParliamentDownload

Please note that the handout contains additional slides covering other items of interest in the news and job adverts, which are provided in partnership with Business Smart Solutions (https://www.businesssmartsolutions.co.uk/).

Recent Posts

  • Tensions in Council Tax Collection: Balancing Policy, Affordability, and Public Perception
  • Policy on the Hoof: Local Taxation and Welfare Reform Under the Microscope
  • The Case for Plain English Council Tax Reduction Schemes
  • Independent R&B Discussion Group: Spending Review Analysis
  • Independent Revenues & Benefits Discussion Group: Council Tax Reduction Review Highlights

Recent Comments

  1. Liz Whitehead Davies on Reform UK’s “Department of National Efficiency”: A High-Stakes Gamble in Local Government Reform
  2. Kevin Stewart on Why Removing the Single Person Discount (SPD) Could Be a Positive Move

Archives

  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023

Categories

  • Administration
  • AI
  • Automation
  • Budget
  • Child Support
  • Conferences
  • Council Tax
  • Council Tax Reduction
  • Credit Unions
  • DOGE
  • DWP
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Fraud
  • General
  • Generative AI
  • Governance
  • Housing Benefit
  • Housing Market
  • Human Resources
  • ICT & support products
  • Inflation
  • Jobs Market
  • LA Reorganisation
  • Legal
  • Mortgages
  • pension Credit
  • Policy and Strategy
  • Politics
  • Reform UK
  • Rental Market
  • Section 114
  • Universal Credit
  • Value for Money
  • veterans
  • Welfare Reform
(c) 2024 Visionary Network Ltd ALL RIGHTS RESERVED