Visionary Network Logo
Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
    • Why VN?
    • Meet the Visionary Panel
    • Privacy Policy
    • Malcolm Gardner
  • Networks
    • Council Tax Support Schemes Uploads
    • Why get involved?
    • Revenues & Benefits Discussion Group
  • Services
    • Clear and Concise
      • Welcome to a New Era of Council Tax Reduction Schemes
        • How it works: Redrafting Scheme Protocol
        • Our Clients
        • CTR Rewrite Pricing
      • Case Study: Reviewing and Simplifying Complex Council Tax Reduction Schemes
    • Consultancy
    • Design of Council Tax Reduction Schemes
    • Training
      • AI For Revenues and Benefits
    • Maximize Pension Credits with Visionary Network’s Partners Ascendant Solutions and Inbest.ai
  • Blog
  • Partners
Menu

Monday Discussion Group: DHP & Second Homes

Posted on 26/07/202326/07/2023 by Malcolm

As we wrap up the last discussion group before our summer hiatus, we want to reflect on the key topics that captured our attention: Second Home Ownership and Discretionary Housing Payments (DHP).

A focus of our dialogue was the nuanced matter of second home ownership. It might seem like a dormant issue at a national scale, but we recognised its potent local implications. The impact varies greatly, depending on whether you’re fortunate enough to own a second property, or conversely, you find yourself unable to acquire a first one due to market inflation by second homeowners. Notably, we also discussed how this becomes a revenue opportunity for local councils when higher council tax is levied on these secondary or vacation properties. It was particularly interesting to note that individuals over the age of 55, especially those with empty nests, are often more likely to invest in a second home, viewing it as a retirement nest egg or a supplementary income source.

Our discussion also brought to light the escalating demand for DHP and its subsequent top-ups – a vibrant debate that we all found insightful. Councils’ increasing top-ups over the past year mirrors the current cost-of-living crisis. Nevertheless, we also acknowledged the emerging dependency and expectations around DHP for some applicants, raising concerns about the sustainability of the scheme. Any potential future cuts by the Treasury or Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) pose a significant risk to councils administering these schemes.

We owe our gratitude to the panel for the energetic discussion, and a special thanks goes out to all participants for their valuable contributions. Your engagement makes these debates an enriching part of our workweek.

Enjoy the summer break and mark your calendars for our return on September 4.

Until then, stay safe and keep the discussions alive!

The recording for this week can be accessed through this link: https://bit.ly/VN230724.  The slide pack is below along with the links to the reports and tables mentioned in both the slide pack and recording.

We also have a WhatsApp group where you can stay connected and participate in further discussions. You can join us here: https://bit.ly/3Qjrkqe.

Please note that the slide pack contains additional slides covering other items of interest in the news and job adverts, which are provided in partnership with Business Smart (https://www.businesssmartsolutions.co.uk/).

IRBDG-20230724Download
lessons-learned-competition-in-public-procurementDownload
Driving-Better-Health-Outcomes-online-versionDownload
2nd-Homes-fact-SheetDownload
Digitisation_0723Download
CPI-annual-and-monthly-inflation-rates-by-divisionDownload
movement-in-priceDownload
consumer-price-inflationDownload
data-tables-use-of-discretionary-housing-payments-2022-to-2023Download

Recent Posts

  • When good intentions meet council tax reality, residents may pay the price
  • Council tax reform: fairer administration, or a bill councils cannot afford to send?
  • The reality of council tax court fees in England
  • DWP Spring Forecast 2026: why the real welfare story is not just higher spending, but a changing social contract
  • Temporary Accommodation – When National Policy Fails, Councils Carry the Cost: Reflections from the Independent Revenues and Benefits Monday Discussion Group

Recent Comments

  1. Liz Whitehead Davies on Reform UK’s “Department of National Efficiency”: A High-Stakes Gamble in Local Government Reform
  2. Kevin Stewart on Why Removing the Single Person Discount (SPD) Could Be a Positive Move

Archives

  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023

Categories

  • Administration
  • AI
  • Automation
  • Budget
  • Child Support
  • Conferences
  • Council Tax
  • Council Tax Reduction
  • Credit Unions
  • DOGE
  • DWP
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Fraud
  • General
  • Generative AI
  • Governance
  • Housing Benefit
  • Housing Market
  • Human Resources
  • ICT & support products
  • Inflation
  • Jobs Market
  • LA Reorganisation
  • Labour Party
  • Legal
  • Mortgages
  • pension Credit
  • Policy and Strategy
  • Politics
  • Reform UK
  • Rental Market
  • Section 114
  • Staffing
  • Universal Credit
  • Value for Money
  • veterans
  • Welfare Reform
(c) 2024 Visionary Network Ltd ALL RIGHTS RESERVED