Visionary Network Logo
Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
    • Why VN?
    • Meet the Visionary Panel
    • Privacy Policy
    • Malcolm Gardner
  • Networks
    • Council Tax Support Schemes Uploads
    • Why get involved?
    • Revenues & Benefits Discussion Group
  • Services
    • Clear and Concise
      • Welcome to a New Era of Council Tax Reduction Schemes
        • How it works: Redrafting Scheme Protocol
        • Our Clients
        • CTR Rewrite Pricing
      • Case Study: Reviewing and Simplifying Complex Council Tax Reduction Schemes
    • Consultancy
    • Design of Council Tax Reduction Schemes
    • Training
      • AI For Revenues and Benefits
    • Maximize Pension Credits with Visionary Network’s Partners Ascendant Solutions and Inbest.ai
  • Blog
  • Partners
Menu

R&B Monday Discussion Group 17/2/25 Key Issues in Housing Benefit and Employment Support

Posted on 19/02/2025 by Malcolm

Correction from previous newsletter: Gareth Morgan noted that in Wales, financial awareness training was available to help train advisors. See https://www.dangos.wales/

The Independent R&B Discussion Group convened on 17 February 2025, bringing together experts and professionals to discuss pressing issues, including the effectiveness of mobile job centres, the crackdown on rogue landlords, and the challenges in supported accommodation funding. Hosted by @malcolm Gardner, the session featured contributions from key industry voices, including Gareth Morgan, @paul-howarth, Naomi Armstrong, Kim Larkin, and Sean O’Sullivan.

Mobile Job Centres: A New Strategy or a Gimmick?

One of the primary discussions centred around the government’s initiative to introduce mobile job centres, an effort aimed at increasing employment by bringing job opportunities directly to communities. However, the effectiveness of this approach was met with scepticism.

Gareth Morgan pointed out a fundamental flaw in the plan, stating that “very few jobs are found through job centres nowadays,” and that employers using job centres often face an influx of applicants who are applying simply to meet benefit conditions rather than genuinely seeking employment.

Paul Howarth echoed this sentiment, suggesting that while increasing accessibility is positive, “this feels like a gimmick rather than a meaningful employment solution.” Elizabeth Whitehead-Davies recalled past experiences with mobile employment initiatives, describing them as often ineffective and unwelcoming.

Kim Larkin suggested that a more effective strategy would be to partner with local employers actively hiring, making the initiative more targeted and outcome-driven.
Government Crackdown on Rogue Landlords

The government’s renewed focus on tackling rogue landlords and housing benefit abuse sparked a lively discussion, with participants questioning the feasibility of the proposed measures.

@kevin-stewart noted that similar initiatives have been introduced repeatedly over the years, yet issues persist due to local government resource constraints. Naomi Armstrong highlighted the difficulty of enforcement, stating that “it is not a benefit officer’s job to assess housing quality; environmental health and homelessness prevention teams should be involved.”

Paul Howarth raised a key concern: “Housing benefit is the tenant’s entitlement, not the landlord’s. Penalising landlords through benefit payments could inadvertently harm tenants rather than resolve the root issue.”

The Crisis in Supported Accommodation

One of the most in-depth discussions focused on the financial pressures surrounding supported accommodation, particularly exempt accommodation. Kim Larkin provided expert insight into the growing problem, explaining that “many providers rely entirely on housing benefit for funding, which was never its intended purpose.”

Sean O’Sullivan emphasised the financial burden on local authorities, particularly in London, where the cost of subsidising supported accommodation is spiralling. He called for a national database to track the costs of alternative accommodation, a proposal that Darren Smith and Kim Larkin confirmed is already in development and set for release in March.

Naomi Armstrong shared a local authority perspective, revealing that her council faces over £700,000 in annual subsidy losses, despite their supported housing providers being well-run and compliant. She criticised the system, calling the subsidy regime “perverse” and in desperate need of reform.

Gareth Morgan highlighted the wider implications, noting that bed blocking in the NHS—particularly in mental health and elderly care—further exacerbates the demand for supported housing.

Towards Solutions

While the discussions revealed systemic flaws, potential solutions were also explored. Kim Larkin advocated for clearer regulatory oversight, while Sean O’Sullivan stressed the importance of government intervention to prevent continued profiteering at the expense of local authorities. The forthcoming database on alternative accommodation costs was welcomed as a step in the right direction.

As Malcolm Gardner concluded, “A lot of this comes down to identifying the problem, but we need real solutions. The government is listening, but it’s not offering answers.”

The recording can be found at https://tinyurl.com/VNR250217.

IR&BDG 20250217Download
CBP-9056Download
colp_evaluationDownload
euro-sf-yei-2021-2023-leavers-survey-reportDownload
hsf4_evaluation_reportDownload
Justice spending in England and WalesDownload
Written statements – Written questions, answers and statements – UK ParliamentDownload

Please note that the handout contains additional slides covering other items of interest in the news and job adverts, which are provided in partnership with Business Smart Solutions (https://www.businesssmartsolutions.co.uk/).

Recent Posts

  • Council tax reform: fairer administration, or a bill councils cannot afford to send?
  • The reality of council tax court fees in England
  • DWP Spring Forecast 2026: why the real welfare story is not just higher spending, but a changing social contract
  • Temporary Accommodation – When National Policy Fails, Councils Carry the Cost: Reflections from the Independent Revenues and Benefits Monday Discussion Group
  • Subscription Spending, Household Budgets and Consumer Behaviour

Recent Comments

  1. Liz Whitehead Davies on Reform UK’s “Department of National Efficiency”: A High-Stakes Gamble in Local Government Reform
  2. Kevin Stewart on Why Removing the Single Person Discount (SPD) Could Be a Positive Move

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023

Categories

  • Administration
  • AI
  • Automation
  • Budget
  • Child Support
  • Conferences
  • Council Tax
  • Council Tax Reduction
  • Credit Unions
  • DOGE
  • DWP
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Fraud
  • General
  • Generative AI
  • Governance
  • Housing Benefit
  • Housing Market
  • Human Resources
  • ICT & support products
  • Inflation
  • Jobs Market
  • LA Reorganisation
  • Labour Party
  • Legal
  • Mortgages
  • pension Credit
  • Policy and Strategy
  • Politics
  • Reform UK
  • Rental Market
  • Section 114
  • Staffing
  • Universal Credit
  • Value for Money
  • veterans
  • Welfare Reform
(c) 2024 Visionary Network Ltd ALL RIGHTS RESERVED