Visionary Network Logo
Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
    • Why VN?
    • Meet the Visionary Panel
    • Privacy Policy
    • Malcolm Gardner
  • Networks
    • Council Tax Support Schemes Uploads
    • Why get involved?
    • Revenues & Benefits Discussion Group
  • Services
    • Clear and Concise
      • Welcome to a New Era of Council Tax Reduction Schemes
        • How it works: Redrafting Scheme Protocol
        • Our Clients
        • CTR Rewrite Pricing
      • Case Study: Reviewing and Simplifying Complex Council Tax Reduction Schemes
    • Consultancy
    • Design of Council Tax Reduction Schemes
    • Training
      • AI For Revenues and Benefits
    • Maximize Pension Credits with Visionary Network’s Partners Ascendant Solutions and Inbest.ai
  • Blog
  • Partners
Menu

R&B Monday Discussion Group 10/2/25 Local Government Reorganisation

Posted on 12/02/2025 by Malcolm

On 10 February 2025, the Independent R&B Discussion Group convened to discuss key issues affecting local government, particularly financial settlements and reorganisation plans. The conversation, led by Malcolm Gardner, covered the latest funding allocations, local government restructuring, and challenges posed by ongoing financial constraints. Key contributors included Gareth Morgan, Laura Bessell, Naomi Armstrong, Robert Fox, and Paul Howarth, among others.

Financial Settlements and Local Government Budgets

The meeting commenced with an overview of the financial settlement for local authorities. Malcolm Gardner highlighted that the core spending power had increased by 6.8%, including £880 million for social care, £515 million to cover rising employer National Insurance costs, and a new £600 million recovery grant aimed at councils in greatest need. However, the County Councils Network reported that only 3% of this grant was allocated to county councils, prompting concerns about funding distribution.

Laura Bessell provided figures from Oxford City Council, indicating that while the National Insurance increase would cost £900,000, only £300,000 had been allocated in compensation. Similarly, the ability to raise income through the core spending review had resulted in just £250,000, leading to an overall deficit. She suggested that this imbalance was designed to push councils towards unitary status, a sentiment echoed by Naomi Armstrong, who described similar disparities in Cambridgeshire.

Several participants, including Robert Fox and Kirsty Brooksmith, acknowledged that financial allocations had been disappointing but not unexpected. Tom Clark and Bob Wagstaff indicated that their councils had not yet fully assessed the implications, while Gareth Morgan noted that in Wales, financial awareness training was available to help local authorities manage their budgets effectively. See https://www.dangos.wales/

Reorganisation of Local Government

A significant portion of the discussion centred on local government reorganisation. The government has announced plans to establish six new Mayoral Strategic Authorities by May 2026, covering Greater Essex, Cumbria, Cheshire and Warrington, Norfolk and Suffolk, Sussex and Brighton, and Hampshire and the Solent. These changes have led to the postponement of elections in nine councils and raised concerns about local representation.

Laura Bessell and Naomi Armstrong noted that regionalisation could be beneficial in terms of economic development and planning, particularly in the Oxford-Cambridge arc. However, they also highlighted the risk of bureaucratic inefficiencies and local rivalries hindering progress. Kevin Stewart expressed concerns about the lack of consultation with local authorities, pointing out that political dynamics often dictate decision-making processes.

Paul Howarth observed that the government was promoting these changes under the banner of devolution but warned that if residents did not feel more empowered, the strategy could backfire. He also noted that financial pressures on councils were increasing, with many facing significant funding gaps. Tom Clark provided an example, stating that his service needed to find £4 million in savings over the next 12 months.

Impact on Procurement, Staffing, and Public Services

The reorganisation plans have introduced uncertainty into long-term strategic planning. Naomi Armstrong explained that key procurement decisions were being delayed due to the lack of clarity about future governance structures. Similarly, Robert Fox highlighted concerns about staffing disparities, particularly in councils with a mix of local and national pay agreements. Gareth Morgan noted that such inconsistencies could lead to further complications during restructuring.

Additionally, trade unions have called for a £3,000 pay increase for all council and school staff, a minimum hourly rate of £15, an extra day of annual leave, and a reduction in the working week. While acknowledging the challenges faced by council workers, Paul Howarth suggested that the government was unlikely to agree to these demands given the current financial climate. Bob Wagstaff pointed out that discrepancies in pay structures were already causing tensions, particularly in outsourced services.

Fraud Prevention and Regulatory Challenges

The discussion also touched on the recent National Audit Office (NAO) report on government fraud prevention. Malcolm Gardner summarised the findings, which highlighted a lack of leadership, poor data quality, and insufficient resources as major barriers to effective fraud detection. He compared the current situation to that of the mid-1990s, suggesting that little progress had been made in addressing these systemic issues.

Kim Larkin provided insights from the supported housing sector, noting that providers were struggling with increased scrutiny. She acknowledged the need for oversight but argued that the current approach was counterproductive, as it placed excessive administrative burdens on legitimate providers while failing to curb rogue landlords. Gareth Morgan added that trading standards had been similarly weakened due to budget cuts, further exacerbating the problem.

Conclusion

The Independent R&B Discussion Group highlighted the complex and often contradictory challenges facing local government. While reorganisation offers potential efficiencies, it also raises concerns about governance, funding distribution, and public accountability. Financial constraints continue to pose difficulties for councils, particularly in terms of staff pay and service provision. Furthermore, the government’s approach to fraud prevention remains inconsistent, leaving local authorities to navigate an increasingly difficult landscape.
As councils work towards meeting the government’s tight deadlines for reorganisation, the coming months will be crucial in determining how these changes unfold. The group will continue to monitor developments and provide a forum for sharing insights and best practices.

Access the Recording

Video

here
IR&BDG 20250210Download
2627-Cabinet-Office-Overview-2023-24-FINALDownload
CBP-9384Download
CBP-10184Download
estimating-and-reporting-fraud-and-errorDownload
Scottish Budget Report_tax_newDownload
SN05682Download
LAHS_open_data_1978-79_to_2023-24Download
england-rates-2025-to-2026Download
scotland-rates-2025-to-2026Download
wales-rates-2025-to-2026Download

Please note that the handout contains additional slides covering other items of interest in the news and job adverts, which are provided in partnership with Business Smart Solutions (https://www.businesssmartsolutions.co.uk/).

Recent Posts

  • Council tax reform: fairer administration, or a bill councils cannot afford to send?
  • The reality of council tax court fees in England
  • DWP Spring Forecast 2026: why the real welfare story is not just higher spending, but a changing social contract
  • Temporary Accommodation – When National Policy Fails, Councils Carry the Cost: Reflections from the Independent Revenues and Benefits Monday Discussion Group
  • Subscription Spending, Household Budgets and Consumer Behaviour

Recent Comments

  1. Liz Whitehead Davies on Reform UK’s “Department of National Efficiency”: A High-Stakes Gamble in Local Government Reform
  2. Kevin Stewart on Why Removing the Single Person Discount (SPD) Could Be a Positive Move

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023

Categories

  • Administration
  • AI
  • Automation
  • Budget
  • Child Support
  • Conferences
  • Council Tax
  • Council Tax Reduction
  • Credit Unions
  • DOGE
  • DWP
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Fraud
  • General
  • Generative AI
  • Governance
  • Housing Benefit
  • Housing Market
  • Human Resources
  • ICT & support products
  • Inflation
  • Jobs Market
  • LA Reorganisation
  • Labour Party
  • Legal
  • Mortgages
  • pension Credit
  • Policy and Strategy
  • Politics
  • Reform UK
  • Rental Market
  • Section 114
  • Staffing
  • Universal Credit
  • Value for Money
  • veterans
  • Welfare Reform
(c) 2024 Visionary Network Ltd ALL RIGHTS RESERVED